| Home Page
Photo Page
Custom Page
About Page
Whats New Page
Catalog Page
Custom2 Page
|
|
|
Okay new evidence of GameFAQ nerds being even GAYER than ever is what I have come up with for you, my fans.
Okay, so this is how it went. Some artist on the GFAQs Fighting Games board decided to put up his artwork of his already accurate Heihachi vs Akuma picture. In this picture (http://www.shoryuken.com/forums/attachment.php?s=&postid=893799) he has Heihachi holding Akumas head, after obvious defeat.
Now, here is my beef.
One by one, a carnival of idiots decide to post. I'll get the exact quotes.
"Nice pic, but Akuma should be holding his head instead."
Yeah, you're a dumbfuck. Congratulations.
Next.
"Heihachi is incapable of defeating Akuma... maybe Dan."
Yeah you've got it! BZZT! WRONG! What the fuck are you tripping on? Foot and Mouth disease? Shut the fuck up. You don't know shit. (Obvious.)
Next.
"Ogre isn't exactly very powerful anyway, and barely comparable to Akuma, since after all Paul is just a normal human being."
OH DAMN, OGRE MUST BE A PUSSY CAUSE PAUL BEAT HIM RIGHT? WRONG, you fucking degenerate. Ever look at the glass as half-full? Maybe Paul is just WAY stronger than both Ogre AND Akuma. Get the fuck out of here with that shit, you fucking mongoloid.
Next, once again.
"Good pic, but like everyone else said, Heihachi has a snowball's chance in hell of even touching Akuma." (This one is from SFJunkie, who I obviously DESPISE for being a fucking moron.)
Alright thanks for repeating the popular reply, asshole. Since you added "a snowballs chance in hell" for this one, I guess you must be original. Anyways, I can't find words that would describe what I think of your idiocy.
I'd just like you to know that you are one of the stupidest people I've ever seen post. Keep it up.
Okay, so what have we learned today kids? The majority of people from GameFAQs are fucking morons, as stated. They'll all jump to a conclusion without even knowing a DAMN thing. (I.E. "I seriously doubt that Heihachi could even touch Gouki. Unless Heihachi did some FANTABULOUS stuff (I don't follow the Tekken storyline. Please inform me) I wouldn't even consider him the victor for this fight.")
OKAY! Heihachi > Jin > Ogre. Ogre = God of Fighting.
Heihachi can also control ELECTRICITY WHICH RUNS THROUGHOUT HIS BODY, THANK YOU!
Let's give everybody who gave me a nice reason to update my site, a hand.
Thanks!
|
|
|
New ignorance oozing from GameFAQs. Great.
"Yes, you play all of those games. And since you have so much proof of your undeniable skill that you can diss someone else good at another game, that you actually have no idea how it plays competatively, and you diss it anyways. It's not like VF or Tekken take much skill to play. I could learn how to play that game in like a week. That other guy is actually correct. Tekken has easy combos, and easy gameplay. I watched plenty of videos, and it's all the same stuff and same combos over and over. Play GGX2, and become a name in that, and I'll believe you. But for now, you're just a no name trash talker. Until you're somebody other than a no name, you're just a trash talking troll. I can talk trash too, not that it would do much good since I have absolutely no recognition in the fighting game scene, much like yourself. Anyways, go back to blah blah blah I am so cool since I play other fighting games that I have absolutely no skill in."
This is aimed towards me after this guy read MeLikePie's "What it means to be the best MK player."
Anyways, the guy is angry and wants to make me feel like I know nothing in order to get me to stop. I think the guy is one of the more ignorant people I've ever seen post on GameFAQs, so I found it quite astonoshing, and decided to show you all too.
If you would like to describe to this man how much of a douchebag he is, please feel free to create an account (if you dont already have one) and post away.
http://s3.cgi.gamefaqs.com/boards/genmessage.asp?board=13784&topic=8998622
|
Description of Product
Detailed description of a product. This description could include: Basic information about the line of products and any information that you might use to describe your product. $ 19.95
|
|
|
|
Description of Product
Detailed description of a product. This description could include: Basic information about the line of products and any information that you might use to describe your product. $ 19.95 |
Description of Product
Detailed description of a product. This description could include: Basic information about the line of products and any information that you might use to describe your product. $ 19.95
|
|
|
|
Description of Product
Detailed description of a product. This description could include: Basic information about the line of products and any information that you might use to describe your product. $ 19.95 |
Description of Product
Detailed description of a product. This description could include: Basic information about the line of products and any information that you might use to describe your product. $ 19.95
|
|
|
|
Description of Product
Detailed description of a product. This description could include: Basic information about the line of products and any information that you might use to describe your product. $ 19.95 |
Description of Product
Detailed description of a product. This description could include: Basic information about the line of products and any information that you might use to describe your product. $ 19.95
|
|
|
|
Description of Product
Detailed description of a product. This description could include: Basic information about the line of products and any information that you might use to describe your product. $ 19.95 |
|
Description of Product
Detailed description of a product. This description could include: Basic information about the line of products and any information that you might use to describe your product. $ 19.95
|
|
|
|
